Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Moto G71 5G, getting a 98 score against 82.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Moto G71 5G has Android 11, giving you some nice extra features. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto G71 5G.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little better performance than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better display than Moto G71 5G, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a bit higher display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back facing camera with much more MP and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.