Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | -- |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G84's general score of 80.9. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 13 OS (Operating System). Moto G84 features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit worse pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much powerful CPU than Moto G84. They have a 12 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G84, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has a lot smaller sensor shooting lot worse quality pictures and videos, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Moto G84 counts with a battery performance that's just as good as Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.