Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, with a 98 score against 76.7. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is a little bit thinner but just a little heavier than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and they were only released with a couple months difference. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and better performance.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better processor than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much more vibrant display than Moto G9 Play, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a much higher screen pixel density and a quite larger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G9 Play, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a battery duration that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior camera than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.