Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, getting a global score of 98 against 80.5. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, although they were only released with a couple of months difference. These devices include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a quite bigger display and a better pixels count in each screen inch. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting worse quality photos, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a battery lifetime that is just as good as Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.