Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power's 78.6 overall score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older and just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, it's construction is still a little thinner.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a little bigger screen and a way greater number of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior camera than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot better video resolution.
The Moto G9 Power counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.