Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 general score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is notably newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video quality. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery duration than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.