Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting a 98 score against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is incredibly newer, but notably thicker and notably heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition have quite similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution, a lot better video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.