Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Play's overall score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is a lot newer, but way heavier and a lot thicker than Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a much better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bigger screen and a greater pixel density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.