Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Moto Z3 Play, getting a 98 score against 76.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than Moto Z3 Play, it's thicker and much heavier. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than the Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.