Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than Motorola One 5G's score of 84.6. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than Motorola One 5G, but both of them are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit sharper screen than Motorola One 5G, because it has a little higher number of pixels in each display inch, a better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a little larger display.
Motorola One 5G has as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one, both of them have a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One 5G features a battery life that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One 5G, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.