Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a lot better than Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and a bit heavier phone than Motorola One 5G Ace, but Samsung was able to make it thinner anyway. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit superior processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a higher display density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a little bit larger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a battery performance that is very similar to Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One 5G Ace, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.