Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, providing some extra features. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design has the same thickness than Motorola One Hyper, but it's a little heavier.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a higher pixel quantity per screen inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little larger screen. The Motorola One Hyper and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have extremely similar memory capacity for apps and games, they have an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features improved battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a lot more mega pixels back camera, a larger aperture to take better images in low-light situations and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola One Hyper, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.