Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than Motorola razr (2022)'s global score of 81.1. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version, so it provides you some extra features. Although it's the best phone we compare here, we must tell that it is also a lot older, just a bit heavier and thicker.
The Motorola razr (2022) features a little faster CPU than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a little larger display and more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a lot better video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light environments and a back camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.