Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 509 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a global score of 98 against 79.2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher resolution camera. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.