Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Nokia 9 PureView, getting a 98 score against 76.4. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer cellphone than Nokia 9 PureView, although it's somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Nokia 9 PureView has a little more vivid display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better processing power than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3320mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way more megapixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.