Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Nokia XR20, with a overall score of 98 against 80.8. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older phone than the Nokia XR20, but Samsung managed to make it extremely lighter and thinner. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version, giving you a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little faster CPU than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Nokia XR20, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much better resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Nokia XR20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4630mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than Nokia XR20, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.