Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a little heavier device than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the OPPO Find X2 Pro both feature really similar processors, both have a 12 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures, it also counts with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a way better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features improved battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 17% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.