Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11, giving a couple additional features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 12 GB of RAM. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a little less pixels per inch of display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better camera than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better video definition and a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.