Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Galaxy A13 5G, having a 98 score against 82.1. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12, so it gives some additional features. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A13 5G, but both are equally thin.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a bit larger screen and a way greater display density. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A13 5G and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G both feature extremely similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.