Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 general score. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is a little bit heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A16 5G. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a higher pixels density and a bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a battery performance that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.