Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.13 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Galaxy A22, having a 11.65 score against 9.13. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide you the same operating system features. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is older, heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy A22.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a much higher pixels count per display inch, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way better video definition and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A22.