Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is better than Galaxy A22 5G's general score of 84.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy A22 5G, but they have the same thickness. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G both count with similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.