Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A30s's general score of 79.8. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy A30s. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11, so it offers a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bit larger screen and a lot better display density.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in low-light environments, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.