Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Galaxy A31's score of 81.3. Although it's the best in this review, we must highlight that it's also a just a little bit thicker and heavier phone. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and better performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A31, because it has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a little bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A31, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels camera, a larger aperture and a way higher video definition.
Galaxy A31's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.