Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | -- |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's overall score of 82. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite smaller display, a just a little lower pixel density and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher video quality, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a battery performance that is just as good as Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.