Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.83 ounces | -- |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Galaxy A34, having a 98 score against 82.9. These devices work with the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so both should provide you very similar OS features. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better processing power than Galaxy A34, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a quite bigger display, a greater screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a same size aperture and a same size sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way more MP back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A34 and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.