Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's score of 79.4. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it is also noticeably older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a little bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G feature incredibly similar batteries duration. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much better video quality and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.