Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A41, getting a score of 98 against 81.7. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy A41, it must be noted that it is also thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A41, because it has a little greater pixel count in each display inch, a little bit larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger aperture, a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a much better video quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.