Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A50s, getting a score of 98 against 86.6. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a incredibly heavier and thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A50s. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a better display density, a little larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher resolution back camera, a bigger camera aperture and a much better video quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.