Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A52's score of 90.7. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A52. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a better display density, a bit bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher video definition and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.