Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's 91.3 score. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is older, somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit larger display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a much better video quality.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.