Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A52s's 91.1 score. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Galaxy A52s has Android 11 version, counting with some nice extra features and performance improvements. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A52s.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution, a little bit bigger display and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality photographs, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher video definition and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A52s has a little bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.