Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer phone than Galaxy A6, although it is extremely heavier and thicker. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a lot higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a larger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a back camera with much more MP, a lot higher video quality and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A6, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A6, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.