Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | -- |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is way better than Galaxy A73 5G's score of 80.5. Even being the best we compare here, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Galaxy A73 5G. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy A73 5G has Android 12 version, offering some nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A73 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, because it has a higher pixels density, a little bigger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A73 5G's battery duration is just as good as Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery performance.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A73 5G. Both have a 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.