Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s 79.2 general score. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s, although it is extremely heavier and a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a little better quantity of pixels in each display inch, a larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP and a way better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.