Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is newer than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s, but it's thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite bigger screen, a better pixel count in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels, a much higher video definition and a much larger sensor. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.