Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.17 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy C5, having a 11.65 score against 9.17. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 11 version and Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is noticeably newer than the Galaxy C5's, although it's a lot thicker and extremely heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy C5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C5, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a little better display density and a really larger screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 92% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a larger aperture for better low-light captures, a much better resolution camera and a lot higher video definition.