Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than the Galaxy C7 Pro's 78.4 general score. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and a lot heavier than the Galaxy C7 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a larger screen, a higher pixel amount in each inch of display and a much better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.