Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy F41, getting a 98 score against 85.2. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy F41, but both are 0.35inches thick. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy F41 has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy F41, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a better quantity of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy F41, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has improved battery life than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.