Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Fold, getting a 98 score against 97.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Fold has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Samsung Galaxy Fold were released with only a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is lighter but way thicker than Samsung Galaxy Fold.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the Galaxy Fold feature very similar processing units, both have 12 GB of RAM and 8 cores. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a slightly better 1440 x 3200px resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much better video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy Fold counts with a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.