Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | PLS |
| 509 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy M12, with a general score of 98 against 80. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is older and a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy M12, it's design is still a little thinner. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M12 has Android 10.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better looking screen than Galaxy M12, because it has a quite bigger display, a much better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a much better display pixels density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M12, because it has a lot better video quality, a camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M12, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy M12 features improved battery performance than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.