Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-07-01 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is a lot better than Galaxy M13's general score of 81.1. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is noticeably older, heavier and a little thicker than Galaxy M13. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Galaxy M13 has Android 12 version, counting with some additional features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy M13 has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a little bit larger display and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior camera than Galaxy M13, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way higher 108 megapixels resolution camera. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M13, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy M13's battery lifetime is very similar to the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.