Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is better than Galaxy M30's overall score of 82.4. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is newer, but way heavier and a little bit thicker than the Galaxy M30. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a higher pixels density and a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a way better video definition, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations, a camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy M30 and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G feature incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.