Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 509 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M51, getting a global score of 98 against 87.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M51 has Android 10. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy M51, and they were only released 6 months apart.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy M51, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.