Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Galaxy M53 5G, having a overall score of 98 against 76.7. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is incredibly older, way heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy M53 5G. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12, so it gives some additional features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a greater pixel number per display inch and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior processor than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M53 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 108 megapixels and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.