Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note 20's 90.8 score. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a little bit thicker and heavier device than Galaxy Note 20. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a CPU that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 24 frames per second video frame rates, the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is more expensive than the Galaxy Note 20, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.