Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a 98 score against 80.4. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is extremely newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's way heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution, a way higher video definition and a bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.