Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is better than Galaxy Note10's global score of 89. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better cellphone than the Galaxy Note10, we must highlight that it's also thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a higher pixels density, a little bit bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better video definition, a lot higher resolution camera and a way larger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot more expensive than Galaxy Note10, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.