Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Galaxy Note10 Lite, having a global score of 98 against 86.2. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also a a bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone. Both devices we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11, so it counts with some extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, more pixels per display inch and a bit bigger display. The Galaxy Note10 Lite and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G feature extremely similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.