Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.28 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 11.65, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's 9.28 overall score. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a lot newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, but it is notably heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a bigger display and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 56% more battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations.